Skip to content

Legal Tech

Will AI Replace Lawyers? What Most Small Firms Get Wrong

Let's talk about the question no lawyer wants to admit they're asking themselves.

Will AI replace me?

I work with small law firms to implement AI safely and effectively, and this is the conversation I have almost daily. It's not just about job security. It's about relevance. About the value you provide. About whether the expertise you've spent years building still matters in a world where machines can draft, research, and analyze legal documents.

You're hearing about AI tools that write contracts, summarize cases, even draft motions. Tasks that used to take a junior associate an afternoon now happen in minutes.

So you're wondering: if software can do that now, what do clients need me for?

If you're a small law firm swamped with intake emails, routine templates, and endless hours of manual admin, you've probably had that moment where someone said:

"You should try AI."

And maybe you did.

You looked into AI tools. Maybe even thought: "Should we hire someone to build something custom?"

But here's the hard truth:

Hiring an AI or a machine learning engineer won't fix your legal workflow problems.

Imagine if every time a new client sent over a contract or a stack of payslips, your system just picked it up, pulled out the right data, and had everything filed, before you even checked your inbox.

This isn't some future tech promise. It's a working system.

What you're about to see isn't something I'm planning to build, it's something I've already built based on a real client engagement.