Skip to content

Why Hiring an AI Engineer Could Kill Your Legal Automation Project

If you're a small law firm swamped with intake emails, routine templates, and endless hours of manual admin, you've probably had that moment where someone said:

"You should try AI."

And maybe you did.

You looked into AI tools. Maybe even thought: "Should we hire someone to build something custom?"

But here's the hard truth:

Hiring an AI or a machine learning engineer won't fix your legal workflow problems.

Watch: Why AI engineers are the wrong solution for most legal workflow problems

In fact, it's one of the fastest ways to waste money and time on AI that never gets used.

I help small legal teams eliminate admin drag and reclaim billable time with AI systems that actually work in the real world, without engineers, new platforms, or months of onboarding.

In this article, I'll show you:

  • Why ML engineers are the wrong fit for small legal teams
  • The real reason most AI projects fail before they start
  • And what to do instead if you want to actually save time with legal AI

Let's set the hype aside and talk about what actually works.

"AI alone isn't the answer. AI applied to the right problem is."

Problem #1: AI Engineers Solve Technical Problems, Not Business Problems

The kind of people who build AI models are trained to build AI models.

That means their instinct is to ask:

  • What cool model can we train?
  • What big dataset can we fine-tune?
  • How do we push the limits of generative AI?

But your problem isn't a research paper.

It's something like: "We spend 6 hours a week manually filling out client engagement forms for similar case types."

The right question there isn't: "Can we build a transformer-based pipeline?"

It's: "Can we automate this workflow with the least disruption and the fastest ROI?"

Machine learning engineers design for model performance. But legal teams need systems designed for business performance: faster intake, fewer errors, and smoother file handling across legacy tools.

The Mismatch Problem

Here's what happens when you hire an AI engineer for a business problem:

What they'll build: A sophisticated document classification system with 94% accuracy
What you actually need: A simple way to sort incoming emails into the right folders

What they'll focus on: Training custom models on your data
What you actually need: Integration with your existing case management system

What they'll deliver: A complex system that requires maintenance
What you actually need: Something that just works, every time

The fundamental issue? AI engineers are trained to solve AI problems. Your firm has workflow problems that might benefit from AI, but they're not AI problems at their core.

  • Struggling to identify what you actually need?

    Let's map out your real workflow bottlenecks and determine whether AI is even the right solution, or if there's a simpler fix.

    Book a FREE Workflow Analysis

Problem #2: AI That's Misaligned with Workflow Gets Abandoned

Here's something I see all too often:

Small firms buy or build some "smart" tool built with cutting-edge tech. A contract analyzer that's 92% accurate, a chatbot that answers FAQs.

But 3 weeks in, the tool is barely used.

Why?

Because it wasn't really plug-and-play for how your team actually works.

  • It didn't integrate cleanly with your document system
  • It changed too much, too fast
  • Or it needed too much input from legal staff already stretched thin

This isn't a model problem. This is a workflow problem disguised as a tech initiative.

The Real Success Metrics

Most AI engineers measure success by:

  • Model accuracy
  • Processing speed
  • Technical benchmarks

But legal teams measure success by:

  • Time saved per week
  • Reduction in manual errors
  • Team adoption rate
  • ROI within 90 days

When these metrics aren't aligned, you get technically impressive systems that sit unused.

"The solution? Start with use cases, not tech."

Ask:

  1. Where are we wasting the most time right now?
  2. Can AI or automation step in without requiring a big change in tools or workflow?

That's how legal teams actually win with AI by designing around the workflow, not around the tech stack.

What to Do Instead: Find the Bottleneck, Then Simplify

Let me share a real client example.

A small 12-person immigration law firm. Buried in manual client intake. Each case would require a paralegal to copy info from PDFs into templates and emails, hours a day spent on data wrangling.

They didn't need to "hire an ML engineer."

They needed someone to map the process and build a thin layer of AI and automation that works with their existing tools.

What We Did Instead

✅ Built a lightweight AI-powered automation layer that extracts data from PDFs and pre-fills the right templates in seconds
✅ No new software to log into
✅ No "training the model" or hiring AI engineers

Now, tasks that took 3+ hours a day? Completed in under 30 minutes.

Result: Saved 40+ hours/month across the team without anyone needing to be "tech-savvy."

The Key Difference

Instead of hiring an AI engineer who would have:

  • Built a custom document processing pipeline
  • Required weeks of training and fine-tuning
  • Created a system that needed ongoing maintenance
  • Cost $100K+ in salary and infrastructure

We built a business-focused solution that:

  • Used existing AI APIs intelligently
  • Integrated with their current tools
  • Required zero maintenance
  • Delivered ROI in the first month

Ready to build AI the right way? This shows you the exact process we use.

The Right Approach: AI That's Fast, Built for Business, and Tied to ROI

Here's the mindset shift:

Don't ask what AI can do.

Ask what's costing us time, and then layer in the simplest possible system to remove the friction.

That could mean: - Using existing tools better - Integrating smarter functionality - Or yes, occasionally building something custom, but only after the business case is bulletproof

Hiring a solo AI engineer is like hiring a Formula 1 mechanic when your office printer is jammed.

You don't need model optimization. You need process optimization powered by the right dose of AI.

The Business-First Framework

Instead of starting with "What AI should we build?" start with:

  1. Audit your current processes: Where are the biggest time drains?

  2. Identify automation candidates: What's repetitive and doesn't require legal judgment?

  3. Choose the simplest solution: Can existing tools solve this with minor modifications?

  4. Test and measure: Does it actually save time and get adopted?

  5. Scale what works: Only then consider custom development

This approach delivers results in weeks, not months, and costs thousands, not hundreds of thousands.

When You Actually Need an AI Engineer

To be clear, there are times when hiring AI talent makes sense:

  • You're a large firm (50+ attorneys) with complex, unique workflows
  • You have dedicated IT infrastructure and can support custom systems
  • You've already automated the basics and need advanced capabilities
  • You have the budget for 6-12 month development cycles

But for most small to mid-size firms? You need workflow optimization, not AI optimization.

  • Ready to optimize your workflows without hiring anyone?

    Let's identify your biggest time drains and build simple automation that delivers ROI in weeks, not months.

    Book a FREE Strategy Session

The Bottom Line: Stop Solving the Wrong Problem

Look, you don't need to hire an AI engineer to save time with legal AI.

You need to stop solving the wrong problem.

Most firms think they need better technology. What they actually need is better workflow design.

The answer isn't hiring a Formula 1 mechanic when your office printer is jammed. It's finding the right tool for the actual problem.

Start With Your Bottlenecks, Not AI Talent

Ask yourself:

  1. Where are we bleeding hours every week on manual work?
  2. What repetitive tasks don't require deep legal expertise?
  3. Which processes break down because they're manual and error-prone?

That's your entry point, not a job posting for an ML engineer.

The Real Success Formula

The firms winning with legal AI aren't the ones with the biggest AI budgets or the most sophisticated models. They're the ones who:

  • Started with clear workflow problems
  • Used the simplest solution that works
  • Focused on adoption over innovation
  • Measured success by time saved, not technical metrics

While your competitors are burning six-figure budgets on AI engineers who build systems nobody uses, you could be saving real hours every week with simple, targeted automation.

Don't join the firms with expensive AI systems gathering dust.

Start with your bottlenecks, not your hiring plan.

And remember: You don't want to have the most advanced AI team. The goal is to have AI that actually works for your business, your team, and your clients.

That happens when you solve workflow problems, not when you hire AI engineers to create new ones.

Thanks for reading, and remember: AI success isn't about the talent you hire. It's about the problems you choose to solve.